Contact Us 647-233-8882
Blogs

Newsletter Signup


RSS Feed

Blog

Blogs

Quick thoughts to stimulate your business development

     
 
How To Get Away From Your Business

Time off is a huge challenge for owner-operators

In fact, before working with Growth Path, most of our clients consider time away from the business a pipe dream. A week in Veradero? Yeah right. Even when the money’s there, most business owners are too scared to leave the business for more than a day or two.

But there comes a time in every business when the owner needs a few weeks away. It may be for a vacation or, as in our case, the scheduled surgery of our principal, Kevin.

If handled well, a scheduled hiatus needn’t impact your business or upset your clients. Planning is key. When preparing for Kevin’s temporary absence this month, we took four critical steps to keep things moving and our clients happy:

1. Notice
Advance notice is everything. Most clients won’t have a problem with your absence provided they know long enough in advance. We let clients know that Kevin would be unavailable two months in advance. Transparency is important. We took on a new client six weeks before Kevin’s surgery date. We offered to start the engagement on Kevin’s return but, because we were so transparent about it, the client was comfortable starting the engagement earlier.

2. Options
When Kevin announced his surgery date, he prepared us that it was unlikely every client would be comfortable continuing with their engagement while he was away. No worries. We simply offered each client the choice of continuing as usual or suspending their engagement in Kevin’s absence. Even though we knew it could impact our monthly revenue, it was the right thing to do. Luckily all our clients were comfortable continuing while Kevin recovered, and they appreciated our giving them a choice.

3. Organize
The two week prior to Kevin’s departure, we kept Kevin on his toes!
• We made sure that all cheques and requisitions were signed before he left

• We made sure Kevin focused on client work he can’t easily delegate e.g. strategy work, in advance so that staff, contractors and strategic partners could focus on execution and project management in his absence

• We set up very clear parameters about when and why Kevin should be contacted during his recovery period, if at all.

An aside: Kevin admitted that having us juggle lots of client-facing deadlines is an ingenious to way to keep us out of Starbucks while he’s away…hmmm…not sure I like this one but it’s proven to be very effective...

4. Rapport
All the great tactics in the world won’t help your business if you take a leave of absence and your clients and staff don’t have a good rapport. It’s important to give your clients an opportunity to get to know your project managers so they can trust them as much as you do. Relationships aren’t built overnight so make sure your clients have at least two months to get to know their project manager before you depart. Even without taking a leave of absence, this will help owner-operators step back from the client work and focus on running the business.

Leaving your business for a period of time carries a financial risk. There’s no getting away from it no matter how well you plan. The bottom line is that, if you can’t absorb a possible financial hit, it’s not the time to leave your business. But assuming you can take a bit of risk in term of your monthly revenue, then plan it well, and your business will be there to welcome you back on your return.

Posted: February 14, 2012 at 12:18 PM
By: Kim McLaughlin
Comments Disabled | Categories: Strategy & Planning
Sales Targets Without Pipelines

A Quick Response

After Kim’s last blog, I had a few clients ask about businesses that are operated based on ‘homerun clients.’ These are businesses that will land clients that make up the bulk of their business.

Similar to the formula in Kim’s blog, I recommend these business look at their three-year run rate and find the average. Then look at their pipeline for the first quarter or two and compare it to the previous year’s pipeline. If their pipeline is full – great, they can take on a bigger growth target. If it’s empty, they know they’re going to fall short the first quarter so to set an unrealistic target will simply put them behind the 8-ball from the get-go.

I know it’s a lot more work but these formulas are critical to understanding your business and your industry over the long term. If you have more questions or comments, feel free to email or simply drop me a line! - Kevin

Posted: January 29, 2012 at 05:10 PM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s | Categories: Account Management Business Development Strategy & Planning
Setting Attainable Sales Targets

As we near the end of January, you’ve probably set your sales goals for 2012 but how do you know if you’ve set realistic targets? Realistic goal setting is an area where most clients fall down. The issue is that setting extravagant sales targets erodes their value as a business planning tool, for budgeting and forecasting.

Last year we grew by 25%, this year we’ll grow by 40%!
After a good year, it’s human nature that sales managers will want to increase the revenue target.  And why not? Onwards and upwards, right? Wrong.

The catch: Oftentimes a single source of referrals or a one-time client can lead to large amount of business in a single year. Basing your sales targets on a single client or stream is risky. What happens if your client goes out of business or changes direction? Meanwhile your company has spent based on that number…yikes. That’s why it’s important to know your businesses baseline and grow from there.

Here’s the fail-safe formula Kevin uses with Growth Path clients:

  1. Review all your business over the last two to three years
  2. Delete any one-off projects, business that are downsizing or have shifted gears from your baseline and take an average of what’s left
  3. Look at where your business came from over the last two to three years
  4. Delete any one-time referrals or sources that have disappeared from your baseline and take an average of what’s left
  5. Take a look at how quickly your sector is growing (e.g. 8% nation-wide)
  6. List new accounts or sectors you’re targeting and the growth in those areas
  7. Take your average baseline (step 2 and 4) and increase it by the average growth in your industry and your client’s industries. Add business you’ve already booked. That should be your new sales target.

This formula eliminates the guess work and provides a reality check for what’s really happening in your business and your industry.

Why shoot for less?
Successful organizations need realistic goals that people believe they can achieve. While it’s true that some sales people respond well to a big audacious goal, many will look at an unrealistic goal as representative of management’s disconnection with reality, and start job hunting.

Making the business case
Most sales staff can’t imagine presenting lower sales target to their managers but there is a way…

It’s important to show management what business or sources of business have disappeared and what’s not replicable. The next step is to immediately show how you’re rebuilding the pipeline in those areas where you’ve indentified steady growth. It’s about working hard to fill pipeline and managing your manager’s expectations.

The important thing to remember is this strategy is great for management.

Consider this: When sales people have realistic targets, management is able to budget and spend properly for the year. So forget about inflated targets. It’s easier to plan based on what we know is going to happen vs. what we dream might happen. This honest approach to planning will keep both managers and staff happy over the long run and that’s key to strategic growth.

Posted: January 22, 2012 at 05:08 PM
By: Kim McLaughlin
(0) Comment/s | Categories: Account Management Business Development Strategy & Planning
Being Better This Year

It’s the new year, and you know how you did last year. You’ve identified areas for improvement, which likely fall into the major categories below, discussed in the last post. Here are some typical ways to be better this year, for inclusion in your updated business plan.

1) Cash flow. Plan your allocations for both the predictable (taxes, lease buyouts, etc) and responsive (both opportunities and emergencies). This buffer allows you to smooth out the spikes. Implement tight discipline on invoicing and receivable follow-up. Develop a bad debt policy. Adjust your line of credit, as necessary. And examine product/service mix to determine how best to promote cash flow friendly offerings, as needed.
2) Business development. Too many owners tell me that their business is unpredictable, and maintaining a pipeline is makework. I don’t believe this, but even where it may be true, run rate history can be a substitute guide. Add new customer acquisition strategies, carefully targeted, and measurable. Monitor retention rate. Don’t spend significantly on customer service initiatives unless you detect an issue. Even so, determine which customers are leaving – it may be the ones you don’t want/need. If your business requires proposals to acquire new business, prepare a comprehensive template which allows you to customize, yet respond quickly with minimal effort. Target business with your highest close rate. 
3) Gross Margin by product or service. Start protecting your most valuable resources – both in cost and in demand. Adjust processes to outline and delegate responsibilities. Determine if your enabling loss leaders actually result in profitable follow-on business, or if you are better off discontinuing these. Develop service packages which leverage your team’s best skills, and which best utilize plentiful resources.
4) Business Goals. Reduce risk with processes and infrastructure. These can include simple things like insurance & line of credit to new backup or security systems, staff policies and effective HR oversight. Plan your most likely areas of growth, even if you think the time is not yet ripe, because you will know how to respond when the economy or opportunity beckons. Determine easiest places to cut costs if necessary – again not necessarily to implement this now. Plan a new initiative which intriques and scares you at the same time – e.g. online sales, Social Media.

Here’s what Growth Path is planning this year in these categories:
Cash Flow: Develop plan for transitioning contract workers to full time. Increase allocations for emergencies and capital replacements. Review line of credit based on new run rates & staffing.
Business Development: Continue development of service packages. Completely re-design & restructure website to keep it fresh, reflect growing abilities, and meet current/predicted browsing trends. Assign oversight and monitoring responsibilities.
Gross Margin by service: Add new retainer based service packages, which allow effective use of contractors (and build contractor loyalty).
Business Goals: Establish a regular presence in social media - to build relationships, not business. Add new alliances, and implement quarterly reviews of existing ones. Review insurance options. Plan ability to manage transitions, vacations, medical leave, etc.

It doesn’t matter how good or bad last year was, there are always things to do to improve. Let’s get at it!

Posted: January 8, 2012 at 11:01 AM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s | Categories: Strategy & Planning
Guidelines for Year End Review

Like many owner managers, it’s time to be introspective about my own business. The first part is easy – figuring out how you did. The second part – determining how to be better – takes more thought.

Reviewing the past year means more though, than just top and bottom line numbers. Yes, determining revenue and profitability growth or loss is important, but too many people stop there. I’m going to spend the rest of this post discussing what you should review, before getting into getting better, because your review should expose those areas of concern. We’ll look at how to deal with these next time – for now focus on identification of key issues. 

1) Cash flow. Do you have considerable spikes, either from lack of receivables, or from capital or operational outlay? Capital expenditures can be planned (I refurnished my office) or responsive (Alex’s laptop died). A line of credit can remove the risk here, but adds operational cost, and it’s those operational costs which can choke your cash flow. How timely was your invoicing and collection? Do you have significant outstanding receivables or bad debt? What does your typical billing cycle look like, and where is you cost concentrated in this?
2) Business Development. Do you have a pipeline of planned work for the next quarter or beyond? Did you add new customers, and if so, did you meet your targets for this? If your business requires proposals to acquire new business, what kind of close rate did you achieve? How was your customer retention?
3) Gross Margin. By product or service. It’s fine to know how the business did as a whole, but to understand the internal levers, you need to know what makes you money, and what is a loss leader. And which resources are tied up with each product – because resource planning allows you to drive both revenue and profitability.
4) Business Goals. In your most recent business plan, you will have laid out goals for the year – not all of them financial. Some may have included building processes and infrastructure to make business more replicable and reduce risk. Some will have included implementing growth, expansion or reduction initiatives. Sometimes you just tried out new things to see if they have an impact – e.g. Social Media. How did you track against achieving these goals?

For the sake of transparency, here’s how Growth Path did.
Cash Flow: excellent through most of the year, then stressed when I opted to make too many capital improvements. Looks to be back on an even keel by January, when it becomes important to accrue for HST and tax season.
Business Development: Pipeline stellar thru end of 2012. Exceeded new customer goals, retention 100%, added back three past clients for new work. It would be truly embarrasing if we didn't do well here. Whew! 
Gross Margin by service: finally managed to make business plans marginally profitable through process improvements. They continue to enable subsequent projects. Added new packages which require little of my time, and more of the team’s specialized resources (writing, project management, etc).
Business Goals: controlled growth for first seven months while closely managing resources. Added fulltime staff. Comfortable with the team’s abilities, opened to new business in August with excellent results. Moved office, and shifted operational spend to offset personal expenditures. Created new service packages. Cemented several co-dependant strategic alliances. Didn’t miss any non-financial goals. Again - whew!

Despite being a good year, there are several obvious ways to be better, and we’ll discuss these in general, and specific next blog.

Posted: December 27, 2011 at 10:19 AM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s | Categories: Strategy & Planning

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] > » 
RSS Feed | Growth Path
 
     
Kevin Kevin Maynard has been an enter-tainment critic and commentator since 1982. His reviews have appeared on “Maynard at the Movies” on CISN-FM, in the Edmonton Journal, Video Prevue, and TV Guide. And The Hockey News. Really. The addition of reliable and talented staff has enabled his increased movie attendance on weekends, and at TIFF every September. 
Oscar hopefuls

Any other year, I'd have been planning this list for a while. Last year with two vastly superior films (King's Speech & Social Network), it was easy to have a start. This past year, I'm afraid I haven't seen what I would normally gauge as an Oscar quality movie. There have been some good ones - Drive, Moneyball, Ides of March - but nothing that rocked me. Part of the problem could be that I saw the wrong films at this year's TIFF. I gave away the tickets to The Artist & The Descendants, and passed on Shame. But the response of the folks who did see these didn't make me run out to correct this.

The Golden Globes aren't a valid indicator in my mind, of the Oscar nominations which will be announced next week. The wins by the movies I missed though indicates that they will be in the pack, and I'd better plan to catch up.

So my short list of what I think will be nominated, cross referenced wtih what I thought of it:

Drive - may have been my favourite film last year. Ryan Gosling has been in almost everything lately, and managed to be completely different from one role to the next. Plays like a 70s anti-hero flick, moody, quiet with bursts of disturbing violence.

Moneyball - sharp dialog from Aaron Sorkin again, and a breakout performance from Jonah Hill. And it really isn't a sports movie, it's just set in that world. Don't see a nom for Brad Pitt though.

Ides of March - Ryan Gosling again, with Clooney behind the camera and supporting. It's hurt by a too-familiar story, but doesn't compromise along the way. And superb performances by the ensemble cast. Several likely acting noms.

Melancholia - hated it. This is what happens when auteurs focus on imagery and wing the story. If there was a script, I couldn't tell.

Tree of Life - pretentious claptrap. See review of Melancholia for more, double strength here.

The Help - Forty five years after In The Heat Of The Night, we kick around the same subject matter with an added dose of Mean Girls. Entertaining and light, but hardly original, and definitely not timely.

Bridesmaids - because everyone liked it, and it was actually better than anyone would have expected. Well crafted and funny. Won't win, of course, but should get the mention.

Midnight In Paris - this counts as superior Woody Allen this century, but would have been middle of the pack in the last. Stretches an interesting conceit, and makes Owen Wilson likeable. Marion Cotilliard and Rachel McAdams are wasted though in one-dimensional roles as a wanton and a harpy, respectively. As a matter of fact, everybody except Wilson is one-dimensional, which may actually be the point.

Margin Call - good performances and tension highlight this topical, thinly veiled account of the sub-prime crash. Too stagey to make a great film from this first time director, and without a strong ending, but well done.

While I may sound a curmudgeon for not liking enough this year, there were several "fun films" that I enjoyed, that won't get a second of consideration by the Academy: Unknown, Super 8, Crazy Stupid Love, Limitless, Source Code, Attack the Block, and Captain America.

I'll comment more on the nominations after they come out, and I catch up on the ones missed.

Posted: January 16, 2012 at 04:05 PM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s
TIFF Notes

Sent my mother-in-law with my wife to see The Descendants. George Clooney came up the red carpet, took her hand, and spoke with her (how are you dear?). Major son-in-law brownie points.

Francis Ford Coppola was a treat in converstaion, with insight, quips and tales of filming, and he genuinely wanted to offer help to any young filmmakers in the audience. His new film Twixt, was at best an interesting failure. The only scene where Val Kilmer came out of his acting coma turned out to be improvised, and while hilarious, was out of sync with the remainder of the film.

Rampart continued Woody Harrelson's streak of interesting independent films. A stellar support cast, and gritty, uncompromising script by James Ellroy (love his books, but know I wouldn't like the man) made for compelling viewing. The open ending left many audience members miffed. I got it, but it was unsatisfying. Again, the theme was moral ambiguity as a tough cop believes he does right while doing wrong - he honestly thinks he's the good guy, and smarter than the system.

Johnnie To is my favourite Hong Kong director these days - I fell in love with his work when he debuted 3 films at TIFF a few years back. He mostly does character driven thrillers, with the visual flair of John Woo and the quirkiness of Tarantino. Life Without Principle started slowly, and turned out to be a drama, with a few thriller elements throw in as a backdrop. All-in-all unexpected, and typically engaging. To always shows up at TIFF to discuss with the audiences, and his English is better each trip here.

Countdown is another Asia thriller, this time from Korea. An assured tale is let down by multiple anticlimactic endings. We all got the symbolism, no need to underline it time and again for fifteen minutes after the story has ended. See it and leave when the plot resolves.

Jason Segal, Ed Helms and Susan Sarandon lend some Hollywood star power to the independent comedy Jeff Who Lives at Home. Quirky, but badly paced, and an ending you'll see coming from the open scene. Good, amusing, but not much more.

My surprise film this year was Violet and Daisy. The writeups made it sound like a Guy Ritchie style action flick. In reality, this tale of two eighteen year old girls who become assassins is a black comedy. The heart of the film is James Gandolfini as the straight man - the girl's intended victim - who imbues the film with it's moral heart while never preaching. Highly recommended.

Moneyball has already opened in theatres, and has serious Oscar hopes. Brad Pitt plays Oakland A's manager Billy Beane, but it's Jonah Hill who is the revelation - not just his usual pudgy sidekick role - as the economics grad who thinks he know a better method for crafting a baseball team. The script by Aaron Sorkin (Social Network) slyly avoids the usual sport movie cliches. Most notably in the lack of inspiring locker room speeches - Pitt actually give the antithesis to this (You aren't losers, you just look like losers). Again, an expectation defying ending takes this out of usual sports movie territory. It isn't a likely best picture winner, but it is very good.

TIFF this year was lacking both the highs and lows for me - could just be my viewing selection, but I wasn't hearing much buzz about surefire Oscar nominations like most previous years. On the other hand, I didn't walk out of anything this year, and the worst film I saw came with a scintillating talk from a favorite director. Another fine TIFF from my perspective.

Posted: September 18, 2011 at 05:03 PM
By: Kim McLaughlin
(0) Comment/s
Moral Ambiguity

The Hunter, starring Willem Dafoe & Sam Neill. The Ides of March with Ryan Gosling and George Clooney (who also directed). TIFF got off to a great start for me with two excellent studies in moral ambiguity.

In The Hunter, Dafoe is sent by a bio-tech company to return with the organs of the last Tasmanian Tiger. It was hard to be invested in a guy out to cause an extinction, and using inhumane traps in a country where they are outlawed. But the film pulls it off, and while you will hate how it ends, it seems inevitable - and possibly the only sensible if not obviously moral choice. All through the film I kept thinking how much difference better film stock might have made to the film's commercal potential, because it had everything else going for it. A Hollywood film (think the Scott brothers) would have made the wilderness more vivid and colour saturated, and increased the visual impact of the stunning natural landscapes.

The Ides of March, my friend Mark characterized as being populated by slimeballs. They are all politicians or aiming to get those slimeballs elected. Enter Ryan Gosling as the upstart looking to gain a reputation by needing to believe in what he is doing. This was a bit more obvious in that the plot twists and conclusion can be seen from afar. But the acting is stellar all around. Philip Seymour Hoffman is perfectly matched by his rival Paul Giamatti - anyone else in either role would have seemed a comparative lightweight. Clooney gave himself the least challenging role, but one for which he seems tailor made. Gosling was just disconnected enough emotionally to make the ambiguity work - there was never an obvious choice for him, always shades of grey. Can't wait to also see him in Drive (for which I was unable to get TIFF tickets, but it opens in another week).

Both of these films are highly recommended, and I expect to see mention of them at Oscar time. The Hunter may be a tougher sell with its slower pace, and limited cinematography palette, but Dafoe deserves strong consideration. Ides of March should get some attention for both best picture and direction, but I would split my supporting actor vote.

Tomorrow - Coppola.

Posted: September 10, 2011 at 07:00 PM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s
TIFF time!

The world's most important film festival is starting, and I am excited again!

The Toronto International Film Festival has overtaken Cannes in recent years, not just for attendance, but as the proving grounds for the Academy Awards. The past four Oscar winners for best picture bowed here - The King's Speech, The Hurt Locker, No Country For Old Men, and Slumdog Millionaire. Departed snuck in between those four and another TIFF entry, Crash.

Picking which films to attend is always problematic, as early indicators of popularity or importance are unreliable. Actually getting tickets is trickier yet. The arcane and incomprehensible system has you pick time slots you wish to attend in early July, and find out the movies in those slots in late August. yes, you can pick up tickets for the daytime showings, but all the high profile films are exempt from those packages.

Still, despite the uncertainty, or perhaps because of it, TIFF is exciting. You don't really know when you will see a gem or a stinker. Last year, the very first movie I saw was The King's Speech, and I knew then it would at least be nominated for best picture. You get surprises and disappointments, and with a few of them, indelible memories. Hearing the film makers and stars speak about the films is enlightening - Colin Firth, Geoffrey Rush and director Tom Hooper were fascinating. Others, the stars show up for the galas, then merely wave. Last year long time faves Clint Eastwood and Woody Allen took to the mike - who cared that it wasn't for their best work. I finally saw them in person!

This year my friend Chuck Kahn & I will hear a talk from Francis Ford Coppola before his latest - Twixt - is screened. Chuck is the perfect person to see these with as he is a noted film and TV editor (Away From Her, Paschendale, Being Erica), and frequently sees/interprets films differently from me - which makes for better conversation. Coppola's string of 70s movies alone make this an event I'm eagerly anticipating.

I will be making up for my negligence in blogging here for the past few months while moving (buying, selling, renovating, going broke in the process) by doing so regularly over TIFF. 

Alright, off tonight to see Willem Dafoe in The Hunter....

Posted: September 9, 2011 at 04:53 PM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s
The Case for the Home Office

It wasn't an easy decision, and it seemed counter-intuitive to me to move back to a home office, when business was at it's strongest. Right around the time that Growth Path celebrated a fifth anniversary, I came to the conclusion that I no longer needed the "professional image" projected by a decent office in a nice building and fine location.

So why? Well, it was time to practice what I preach about recognizing the evolution of your business - in this case mine. It started from a home office, which I'm quite comfortable with - I've always had the right discipline to work from home, some don't. Little over a year later, business was strong enough to withstand the monthly hit of rent in the aforementioned office. And the office definitely had an effect. It made closing business easier, as it projected an image of success and establishment. It was a great move, and business continued to grow as a result.

As Growth Path has matured, we've come to focus on owner managers. They tend to be a roll-up-the-sleeves bunch, and appreciate a little informality. Many of them used to be "suits" (like me), and gave it up to follow their own dream. As a result, my own garb began to morph into a series of exquisite Hawaiian shirts. The image - or brand - was of confidence, and little need for formality. My clients found it both amusing, and reassuring that I didn't 'put on airs'  with them. And as we got more relaxed, most of my client base and collaborators became friends. And most of Growth Path's business came through these friends - people who invited me into their homes, and who came to mine.

As the Growth Path team grew, I discovered that the huge benefit in working with people better at what they do than me, is that they are reliable and dedicated. The employment model quickly became on of a remote workforce who occasionally got together for meetings, but mostly worked from their own homes.

So Growth Path didn't need the office to attract business, the employees didn't need the space, and I didn't need the discipline of heading to the office to work. So it was never a financial decision. In fact, as I am currently moving into a new home, the office space needs to be completely furnished, and I can guarantee there won't be any savings involved. The key will be to create a professional work-space, where colleagues and clients can feel they are in an office, which just happens to be in a home. Then they can come out back for a BBQ.

So yeah, it's going to be back to a home office. Move date is July 15, and the office is the top priority to be up & running by the following Monday. Will it be permanent? Who knows, but it's what suits the business, my customers, colleagues and staff best for now. 

Posted: June 2, 2011 at 07:30 PM
By: Kevin Maynard
(0) Comment/s

[1] [2] [3] > » 
RSS Feed | Kevin's Komments

 

Growth Path Strategic Marketing Inc. was established in 2006 to help small to mid-sized companies establish sustainable growth and profitability.

We are located at 146 Montgomery Avenue in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

   
Growth Path Supports: 
  Interested in B2B networking? Check out

TPTF logo

BNI Corporate Exchange

Business Development
Targeted Initiatives
Expanded Services
Strategic Partnering
more ...
Customer Focus
Client Advisory
Key Messaging
Customer Service
more ...
Product Management
Portfolio Expansion
Productized Services
Sector Specificity
more ...
Growth Planning
Business Strategic Plans
Targeted Expansion
Channel Management
more ...

Account Development
Sales Processes & Discipline
Account Mining
Customer Action Plans
more ...